Entry Level Selection
Most organizations hiring at volume do not build their own entry level tests. They purchase a commercially available instrument, which is usually the right decision. What the vendor does not supply is evidence that using that instrument in this organization, for this position, with this applicant population, is job related and consistent with business necessity.
Prism Data provides the validation and documentation that makes a purchased instrument defensible in its actual context, and analyzes the full selection sequence rather than any single step within it.
What the Work Covers
Entry level selection engagements address the instrument, the sequence it sits within, and the documentation supporting both:
Local Validation Studies
Criterion-related or content validation conducted with the organization's own applicant and incumbent populations, establishing that the instrument predicts performance in this specific setting.
Transportability Studies
Where local validation is impractical, documented evidence that validity established elsewhere transfers to this position, based on job comparability analysis.
Adverse Impact Analysis
Selection rate comparisons by protected group at every stage of the process, since impact frequently arises from the sequence as a whole rather than from any single hurdle.
Cut Score Setting
Defensible standards tied to the level of proficiency the position requires, rather than to a conventional percentage or to the number of vacancies.
Selection Sequence Review
Analysis of how components are ordered and weighted, including whether early hurdles are screening out candidates who would have succeeded.
Documentation Package
Written records prepared to the standard the Uniform Guidelines expect from an organization defending a selection procedure.
What You Get From It
High-volume hiring multiplies the consequences of an unexamined procedure across every applicant it touches.
Evidence Behind the Instrument
A validated basis for using the assessment you have chosen, specific to your position and population rather than to the vendor's norm group.
Early Warning on Adverse Impact
Analysis that identifies disparities while they can still be addressed, rather than after they appear in a complaint.
Defensible Standards
Cut scores tied to documented proficiency requirements, which is the part of the process most frequently attacked and least frequently justified.
Reduced Exposure Over Many Decisions
A single validation effort supports every hiring cycle that follows, spreading the benefit across a large number of decisions.
Where This Applies
Continuous or Cyclical Hiring
Organizations running recurring intake for the same position, where a single validation effort supports many hiring cycles.
Newly Adopted Instruments
Organizations that have purchased a test or assessment and need evidence supporting its use before relying on it for decisions.
Demographic Shifts in the Applicant Pool
Situations where the composition of applicants has changed and existing validation evidence may no longer reflect current conditions.
Related services & research
Explore related work and the published research behind our methods.
Hiring at volume?
We can establish the validation evidence and documentation that supports the instruments and standards you are already using.
Contact Us Today